{Note (added
on April 2, 2015, months before the LHC run II):
There should be a vacuum boson {as vacuum [d (blue), -d
(-yellow)] quark pair} transformed into vacuum {u (yellow), -u (-blue)}, see http://www.prequark.org/pq11.htm .
This vacuum boson's mass should be:
{Vacuum energy (about 246 Gev) divided by 2} + {a push over
energy (vacuum fluctuation, about 2.46 Gev)}
= 123 + 2.46
= 125.46 Gev.
The above
calculation has only one parameter: the vacuum energy. As a vacuum boson, its
key feature is having a zero (0) spin.
Three years
after the discovery of this new 125.4 Gev boson, the Higgs mechanism is not
verified (see article form Nigel Lockyer, Director of Fermi Lab. at http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2014/04/24/massive-thoughts/
). That is, the Higgs mechanism is wrong, totally nonsense, and of course there
is no Higgs boson; it is a Vacuum Boson.
End note.}
CERN did it again, with caveats forever. In the press
releases (AMS experiment measures antimatter excess in space, http://press.web.cern.ch/press-releases/2013/04/ams-experiment-measures-antimatter-excess-space ) on April 3, 2013, CERN said, “These results
are consistent with the positrons originating from the annihilation of dark
matter particles in space, but not yet sufficiently conclusive to rule out
other explanations.
...
said AMS spokesperson, Samuel Ting. “Over the coming months,
AMS will be able to tell us conclusively whether these positrons are a signal
for dark matter, or whether they have some other origin.
…
One possibility, predicted by a theory known as
supersymmetry, is that positrons could be produced when two particles of dark
matter collide and annihilate. Assuming an isotropic distribution of dark
matter particles, these theories predict the observations made by AMS. However,
the AMS measurement cannot yet rule out the alternative explanation that the
positrons originate from pulsars distributed around the galactic plane.
Supersymmetry theories also predict a cut-off at higher energies above the mass
range of dark matter particles, and this has not yet been observed. Over the
coming years, AMS will further refine the measurement’s precision, and clarify
the behaviour of the positron fraction at energies above 250 GeV.”
This CERN’s news-hype was criticized immediately by a few
prominent physicists. In the article (First results of AMS-02 , http://resonaances.blogspot.com/2013/04/first-results-of-ams-02.html
), it says, “They say that ‘...over the
coming months, AMS will be able to tell us conclusively whether these positrons
are a signal for dark matter...’. However this is just a lot of smoke without
fire. There's absolutely no way that measurements of the positron spectrum may
give us a reliable evidence for dark matter: not now, and not anytime soon."
In the article (AMS Presents Some First Results on Cosmic
Rays and Dark Matter, http://profmattstrassler.com/2013/04/03/ams-presents-some-first-results/#comment-51341
), it says, : "Despite what you may read, we are no closer to finding dark
matter than we were last week. Any claims to the contrary are due to scientists
spinning their results (and to reporters who are being spun)."
LHC, Planck and AMS are great gadgets, and they produce
great facts (data). However, these gadget facts are differentiated truths.
Integrating them is more important than those truths themselves (see http://profmattstrassler.com/2013/03/28/hes-not-wrong-the-us-and-science-research/#comment-50470
). Yet, there are many different ways of integration.
a. Hodgepodge integration --- the similar truths are mixed
together to form a hodgepodge, such as with the discovery of electron, proton,
quark, …, neutrino, … to construct the Standard Model.
b. Mission-based integration --- for particle physics, it has, at least, two
types of mission.
i. Public (Pu-)
mission --- the public demands it to
make, at least, two applications
1. How did
life arise?
2. How did universe
arise?
ii. Physicist
(Ph-) mission:
1. How to
unify the quantum and determinism.
2. How to
encompass the gravity.
However valid that the Standard Model is in terms of the
gadget data, it is only a very small niche truth at this point, without any
hint for contacting the life rising mechanism and even failed in terms of the
Planck data. The collect subconscious of
the public knows exactly what the truth is. An isolated niche truth is not only
with little value but is definitely not a true truth.
Thus, however successful the Standard Model is as gadget
facts, it is a junk when it fails on the above missions. On the other hand, if
a particle theory is a mission-completed theory, it will definitely be Nature
physics, as it has integrated over many gadget truths and fulfilled the
required missions. Mission-criteria epistemology (based on integrated facts) is
more powerful than any gadget fact based epistemology (as only differentiated
truth).
Biological life is an information processing system, that
is, it needs a bio-computer. And, we already know that the glider of Life Game
(of John Conway) can be the base for building a Turing computer. Thus, in the
life-system hierarchies (from elementary particles to atoms to bio-compounds),
if we can find a glider-like structure in one tier, we have found the
life-rising mechanism.
I have also showed that an iceberg model can wholly explain
the Planck data (see http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2013/03/planck-data-last-straw-on-higgs-back.html
).
Thus, if a particle theory can encompass both the framework
of a glider and the iceberg model, it is the Public-mission-completed
theory. The Prequark Chromodynamics is,
indeed, such a particle theory (see http://www.prequark.org/pq05.htm
).
Furthermore, it is quite easy to prove a theorem below.
Theorem: If and only if Theory A (TA) is
public-mission-completed, then TA is Physicist-mission-completed.
Now, with the Prequark Chromodynamics being fully developed,
the Higgs game is over.
No comments:
Post a Comment