Linguistics Manifesto: 2016

Thursday, August 11, 2016

Mainstream physics: rescued from the Hellfire dungeon

The mainstream physics was imprisoned in the hellfire dungeon by four guarding curses:

How to calculate Alpha?

How to calculate (and account for) Planck CMB data?

How to calculate Vacuum (wrongly named as Higgs) boson’s mass?

How to calculate Cosmology Constant?

The mainstream’s hope relies on finding some new particles (SUSY, WIMPs, Extra dimensions, sterile neutrinos, etc.), but that hope was crushed by the 2016 data from {LHC, LUX, IceCube, etc.}. Furthermore, any more data from LHC will help very little, as the discovery rate will decrease exponentially, see graph below.

That is, the entire mainstream BSM is now dead. There is no hope of any kind for the mainstream physics to escape from the imprisonment of the Hellfire dungeon via the help from mainstream BSM.

Fortunately, all those four curses are removed by the G-string quantum-gravity.

One, Calculating Alpha:

See https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/totally-blind-deaf-googlefacebookblogosphere-era-jeh-tween-gong

Two, calculating (accounting for) Planck CMB data:

See https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2015/04/22/dark-energydark-mass-the-silent-truth/

Three, calculating Vacuum (wrongly named as Higgs) boson’s mass:

G-string beta decay

Step 1: picking up a (d, -d) vacuum to form a five-quark blob

Step 2: vacuum transformation {(d, -d) to (u, -u)} via a vacuum boson

Step 3: exchanging prequarks, W-like weak current

See https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/before-lhc-run-2-begins-enough-jeh-tween-gong

Four, calculating (accounting for) Cosmology Constant:

See https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2016/04/24/entropy-quantum-gravity-cosmology-constant/

This G-string rescue was presented at {Strings 2016 conference (http://ymsc.tsinghua.edu.cn:8090/strings/ )} held at Tsinghua University, Beijing China (from August 1 to 5, 2016), by my Protégé Dr. Li xiaojian. The key points of this presentation is available at https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2016/08/01/the-final-total-toe-theory-of-everything/ .

My Protégé Dr. Li xiaojian (Professor of North China University of Technology, Beijing, 100144, China) discussed This “G-string rescue” with Dr. David Gross (Nobel laureate) on August 5, 2016; see photos below.

About “The Final Total TOE”: see, https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2016/08/01/the-final-total-toe-theory-of-everything/

About the new LHC 2016 data: see, http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2016/07/before-cern-lhc-2016-data-release-three.html and https://medium.com/@Tienzen/before-the-cern-lhc-2016-data-release-7fdb0eba4ace#.tceeg69lr

About the physics epistemology: see, https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2015/05/15/paul-steinhardts-remorse-popperianism-and-beauty-contest/

About the Higgs: see, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/before-lhc-run-2-begins-enough-jeh-tween-gong

The current (2016) mainstream physics status is this: #PostCheckmateTTF (Post Checkmate temper tantrum fit).

See https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2016/08/26/vision-eulogy-the-post-checkmate-temper-tantrum-fit/

M-string claims that the low-energy string vibrational patterns (wavelength and amplitude) on Calabi-Yau space correspond to our familiar elementary particles (fermions and bosons).

Where is the list for this {particle/music note} description?

Is this just a hot air hype?

See https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2016/09/11/the-era-of-hope-or-total-bullcrap/

The PDF version of my new book {Nature’s Manifesto --- Nature vs Bullcraps, https://tienzengong.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/natures_manifesto2.pdf } is available at for a limited time.

Friday, July 29, 2016

Before the CERN LHC 2016 data release: three predictions

LHC will release its 2016 data on or about August 5, 2016. I will make some pre-release comments (predictions) here.

One, about the 750 Gev bump of 2015 data.

In 2015, LHC collected about 4 fb(-1) amount of data and saw a 750 Gev bump by both groups (Altas and CMS).

This year so far, LHC has collected about 13 fb(-1) amount of data (more than 3 times the last year).

Everyone else viewed the last year bump as a new ‘particle’ while I see it as an excited vacuum state. There are some major differences between the two.

First, a particle can only decay while the excited state can ‘dissipate’. It can dissipate by mimicking as a particle decay. It can dissipate to a lower state (not as a particle decay), etc.

Second, the excited state has a value of 738 Gev, not 750. So, the better data should show that there is no bump for 750.

Third, a new particle should not change the production rate for the vacuum boson while the excited state would. This will be the key (litmus) test for both the vacuum boson and the new bump (if any).

See https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/totally-blind-deaf-googlefacebookblogosphere-era-jeh-tween-gong

With these three points, the 750 bump should be gone (disappear) in the new data set.

Two, about SUSY

There is no mainstream-SUSY in G-string physics. That is, in the new data should not show any sign of SUSY. SUSY is strongly related to M-strings.

Originally, SUSY has nothing to do with M-strings. It is an ‘extension’ for SM which has a ‘naturalness (fine tuning)’ issue.

Naturalness (fine tuning): in SM, many constants (especially Alpha) cannot be calculated but must be placed into equations by hand (called as free parameters). Furthermore, with the gauge symmetry, those nature constants do not work well with the gauge symmetry framework, being too small. So, if gauge symmetry is correct (as guiding principle), those constants are wrong (not nature). So, those constants are not ‘nature’ in accordance with the gauge symmetry; that is, there must be a fine-tuning to get them. {Naturalness} means that those nature constants are not ‘nature’ but are the results of some {fine-tunings}.

So, SUSY was invented as that fine-tuning machine. The small mass of the so-called Higgs boson further demands the requirement of fine-tuning, in order to cancel out the large mass demanded by the gauge symmetry.

Then later, SUSY was the consequence of M-string calculation, and this became the greatest String-discovery. From that point, SUSY and M-string become a shared-body twin. The {no show} of any SUSY at this new upcoming LHC data will be a big blow to the M-string.

Of course, there cannot be any SUSY signal as the calculation of Alpha is clearly shown below, and there is no {naturalness} issue. SUSY is dead.

See http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2012/04/alpha-fine-structure-constant-mystery.html

Three, LHC is able to search for the dark matter. As the current dark matter are mainly produced during the Big Bang period, LHC should produce some dark matter as some collisions could reach the condition similar to the Big Bang. This is the direct search.

If LHC is unable to produce dark matter directly, its collisions are still surrounded by existing dark matter. That is, the bystander test can be performed. If there is no roadblock (blockage) for ALL the decaying pathways, there is no bystander (no dark matter particles).

Dark mass is now totally accounted for in the graph below. That is, no dark matter of WIMP kind can be in the new LHC data.

See https://medium.com/@Tienzen/final-toe-theory-of-everything-9b12ec7c0c9f#.76ic1tji0

The recent LUX data has put WIMPs on the death row. The {no show} of dark matter in the upcoming LHC data will condemn it once more. Yet, only the correct {dark energy/dark mass} model buries WIMPs properly.

No Stay of execution for WIMPs.

My Protégé Dr. Li xiaojian (Professor of North China University of Technology, Beijing, 100144, China) discussed my predictions and my “The Final Total TOE” with Dr. David Gross (Nobel laureate) on August 5, 2016; see photos below.

My “The Final Total TOE” was presented at {Strings 2016 conference (http://ymsc.tsinghua.edu.cn:8090/strings/ )} held at Tsinghua University, Beijing China (from August 1 to 5, 2016), by Dr. Li xiaojian too. The key points of this presentation are available at https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2016/08/01/the-final-total-toe-theory-of-everything/ .

About the physics epistemology: see, https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2015/05/15/paul-steinhardts-remorse-popperianism-and-beauty-contest/

About the Higgs: see, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/before-lhc-run-2-begins-enough-jeh-tween-gong