Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Higgs Boson, a bad idea, part seven

{Note (added on April 2, 2015, months before the LHC run II):

There should be a vacuum boson {as vacuum [d (blue), -d (-yellow)] quark pair} transformed into vacuum {u (yellow), -u (-blue)}, see http://www.prequark.org/pq11.htm .

This vacuum boson's mass should be:

{Vacuum energy (about 246 Gev) divided by 2} + {a push over energy (vacuum fluctuation, about 2.46 Gev)}
= 123 + 2.46 = 125.46 Gev.

The above calculation has only one parameter: the vacuum energy. As a vacuum boson, its key feature is having a zero (0) spin.

Three years after the discovery of this new 125.4 Gev boson, the Higgs mechanism is not verified (see article form Nigel Lockyer, Director of Fermi Lab. at http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2014/04/24/massive-thoughts/ ). That is, the Higgs mechanism is wrong, totally nonsense, and of course there is no Higgs boson; it is a Vacuum Boson.
End note.}

When the epistemology of physics depends on a gadget (such as Tevatron or LHC), it is a gadget physics. When the epistemology of physics depends on its contacting to realities (such as the issues of rising of life, of intelligence, of mathematics, etc.), it is the reality physics. Thus, the controlling principle for the reality physics is the common sense.

There are two good things about common sense; 1) it can be understood by everyone, including physicists, 2) it can easily discuss the BIG picture in addition to the nitty-gritty.

At this moment of great discovery at LHC and Tevatron, I would like to offer some common sense to paint a big picture.

The works of web page and websites are now common sense knowledge. Every web site has a home page, and it could have some internal pages, often hyperlinked from the home page. Sometimes, those internal pages come out as Popup Windows, and I would like to call them as pops.

Our universe can be viewed as a website. The Big Bang is the home page, the Grand Daddy Pop (the GD pop). Under this GD pop, there are a few other pops, the Life pop (life sphere), the Intelligence pop, the Linguistics pop, the Mathematics pop, etc..

Every pop (page) has, at least, two types of context; 1) some texts, 2) some hyperlinks to the other pops. For some internal pops, they can be the end of links without any outgoing links. However, for the GD pop (being the Grand Daddy, the home page), it must have outgoing links to reach all internal pops. In fact, it is those outgoing links defining the GD pop.

There is no need to prove that the Big Bang is the GD pop. If anyone disagree with this, then so be it. As a GD pop, it must have links to all other pops. That is, the vitality of a GD pop “theory” can be easily checked with the following checklist.
a. Does it link to (give rise to) the Life pop?
b. Does it link to (give rise to) the Intelligence pop?
c. etc..

This Big pop picture was ignored for long time as our physics theories were too primitive, purely as a gadget physics which ignores all the common sense realities. Now, we are reaching the gate of a final theory,  and these pop links must become the final checklist. Physics can no longer hide in an isolated page without dealing the issue of contacting the realities. 

Does Higgs encompass all those pop links? Even with a real Higgs boson, it does not provide a link to realities, the rising of life, of intelligence and of Mathematics. The Higgs boson is simply a bad idea even if there were a real Higgs.

No comments:

Post a Comment