Higgs Boson, a bad idea, part nine

{Note (added on April 2, 2015, months before the LHC run II):

There should be a vacuum boson {as vacuum [d (blue), -d (-yellow)] quark pair} transformed into vacuum {u (yellow), -u (-blue)}, see http://www.prequark.org/pq11.htm .

This vacuum boson's mass should be:

{Vacuum energy (about 246 Gev) divided by 2} + {a push over energy (vacuum fluctuation, about 2.46 Gev)}

= 123 + 2.46 = 125.46 Gev.

The above calculation has only one parameter: the vacuum energy. As a vacuum boson, its key feature is having a zero (0) spin.

Three years after the discovery of this new 125.4 Gev boson, the Higgs mechanism is not verified (see an article from Nigel Lockyer, Director of Fermi Lab. at http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2014/04/24/massive-thoughts/ ). That is, the Higgs mechanism is wrong, total nonsense, and of course, there is no Higgs boson; it is a Vacuum Boson.

Endnote.}

The experimental particle physicist "Tommaso Dorigo" quoted a passage in his blog, “If we had not previously introduced it [Higgs boson] to generate the heavy boson masses, we would have been forced to invent it now to guarantee renormalizability."

Indeed, for Standard Model, Higgs mechanism is the foundation for making SM meaningful by providing a mechanism to give particles their mass. However, the final hiding place for any Higgs (standard one or the SUSY ones) is shrinking fast. Before the end of this year, a final verdict on Higgs fate (live or die) will be determined.  Now, many people are coming out in bashing the Higgs idea. On October 11, 2011, Vladimir Kalitvianski (Theoretical Nuclear Physicist) said in Tommaso's blog, "That's what I say - Higgs is a patch of a bad construction."  In the book "Linguistics Manifesto"(ISBN 978-3-8383-9722-1, published in December 2010, available at Amazon and Barnes & Noble), it emphasized twice about Higgs being a bad idea. Again, in this blog, I have written many posts about the Higgs being a bad idea since May 6, 2011 (http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2011/05/higgs-boson-bad-idea.html ). Yet, the point here must not be about who was the first pointing out that Higgs was a bad idea.

In fact, for any model, it needs a Higgs-like mechanism to provide the Higgs-effect (providing mass for particles) although the Higgs mechanism itself is wrong in its construction.

Without using detailed equations, the Higgs mechanism can be roughly described with the following analogy.

This universe is divided into two parts, the space-time sheet, and a particle zoo.

Every particle is an Achilles-like creature, with hands and feet, but it is massless.  In order for any particle to get a mass, Higgs invented a Higgs ball (boson) with “mass”. When Achilles bounces this Higgs ball between his left and right hands, this ball’s changing momentum gives Achilles an apparent mass. How big a particle’s mass is depending on how hard it plays with this Higgs ball. And, this is the Higgs mechanism.

If the nature is indeed constructed with this Higgs mechanism, it is still a very bad idea, and we should send an email to the Creator giving him a better idea. Why is this Higgs idea so bad?

1. It is a unique particle, completely different from all other particles. That is, it takes a “special” order for its construction. This is wasteful and tiresome.

2. Every particle with mass needs to carry one Higgs around. This seemed stupid.

3. There is a better idea than the Higgs invention.

Remember, there is a space-time sheet. If this space-time sheet has a “step”, and this Achilles particle is jumping up-and-down and down-and-up with its feet endlessly at this “step”, then this process is, in fact, identical to the Higgs mechanism with only the difference of playing different balls, one the Higgs ball (must be specially ordered) and the other the space-time sheet ball (already here).  How big a mass for a particle depends on how deep it sinks into this space-time sheet. That is, the mass of a particle shows the degree of confinement of that particle being bound to the space-time sheet, and this can be called as gravity. As every particle is trapped in the space-time sheet, there is no need to carry a special Higgs ball just to get a mass.

Perhaps, you already noticed that this Gravity-mechanism requires a “step” in the space-time sheet for a particle to jump up-and-down (providing the momentum changes) endlessly. This “step” is the result that the space-time sheet is, in fact, made of two pieces, and the particle is flip-flop between these two endlessly. The detail of this space-time sheet “step” is described in the article “The Rise of Gravity and Electric Charge.” (at http://www.prequark.org/Gravity.htm ).