Saturday, September 17, 2011

Higgs Boson, a shadow of the Prequark field

In the Grenoble conference ( France, July 20, 2011), the Higgs boson was ruled out except a bump around 110 to 140 Gev area. In the Mumbai conference ( India, August 22, 2011), the hope for that bump was significantly diminished.  Then, the LHC (CMS) seminar on September 12, 2011, officially rule out the followings.
1. Any supersymmetric particle below 1 Tev.
2. Any fourth generation particle in the tested energy range.
3. The hope for the previous bump not improved.

Now, the LHC (ATLAS) seminar is scheduled on September 20, 2011, with an unprecedented sensitivity of over 2fb-1 of data. Yet, I would like to make one more prediction about Higgs boson which is a bad idea two days before the ATLAS data is released.

First, the current mainstream supersymmetry theories are bad ideas for the following reasons.

The baryongenesis which encompasses the entire corporeal universe was a result of the breaking of a “perfect” symmetry.  Thus, the symmetry partner of this baryongenesis will never be a part of this corporeal universe, by definition.

In the book “Super Unified Theory” (ISBN 0-916713-02-4, Copyright # TX 1-323-231, Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 84-90325), it (in page 45) describes a cyclic universe, with matter universe and anti-matter universe appear in circles of each other, with big bangs and big crunches. This version of supersymmetry principle (different from the mainstream version) was discussed on page 79.

This version of supersymmetry has the following traits.
1. The energy conservation is maintained at the “infinite point” while the creation of “each” universe does create energy.

2. The acceleration of the expansion of the universe is the direct consequence of this constantly created new energy which comes from the forward moving time.  Yet, the “local” energy conservation is maintained as the newly created energy takes up the new space and does not increase any energy in the old space. This point was discussed in the page 50 (ibid).

In fact, as every corporeal “particle” carries a positive energy, it has two souls in order to cancel that positive energy out for the ultimate energy conservation principle.
a. The corporeal soul --- its gravity (negative energy, in this corporeal universe) which confines it in this corporeal universe.

b. The heavenly soul --- its supersymmetry partner (in the next anti-matter universe) which ensures the final energy conservation at the end (the infinite point). Thus, the mainstream supersymmetry theories are not wrong, as they do describe the soul-particles which are needed for the baryongenesis symmetry breaking. Yet, those supersymmetry particles cannot be found in this universe.

Second, the Prequark Chromodynamics (PC, ) meets all LHC results.
1. Prequark Chromodynamics (PC) needs no Higgs mechanism, as it is only a shadow of the prequark field. The mass rising mechanism of PC is described by the equation for the “Fine structure constant”, at ( ). Being the shadow of the prequark field, the Higgs mechanism is basically not wrong, but the Higgs boson is not needed.

2. In PC, the generations of quarks are a color charge which is a ternary charge. That is, the fourth generation of quark is prohibited.

3.  Prequarks are not “particles”. Prequarks are the constituent parts of the quark, the same as Ocean, space and a big chunk of ice are constituent parts of a visible iceberg. That is, the prequarks are not sub-particles of quarks. Vacutron is simply the vacuum background. Angultron is a unit angle which breaks the geometric singularity point into a multidimensional space, sees the page (  ). Thus, prequarks are the fibers of space-time. And, the quark is only a protrusion from the space-time. Being the fibers of space-time, prequarks give rise to the gravity directly.

With the above, although the Higgs mechanism (being a shadow of the prequark field) is not wrong, it is not the best idea.

{Note (added on April 2, 2015, months before the LHC run II):

There should be a vacuum boson {as vacuum [d (blue), -d (-yellow)] quark pair} transformed into vacuum {u (yellow), -u (-blue)}, see .

This vacuum boson's mass should be:

{Vacuum energy (about 246 Gev) divided by 2} + {a push over energy (vacuum fluctuation, about 2.46 Gev)}
= 123 + 2.46 = 125.46 Gev.

The above calculation has only one parameter: the vacuum energy. As a vacuum boson, its key feature is having a zero (0) spin.

Three years after the discovery of this new 125.4 Gev boson, the Higgs mechanism is not verified (see an article from Nigel Lockyer, Director of Fermi Lab. at ). That is, the Higgs mechanism is wrong, total nonsense, and of course, there is no Higgs boson; it is a Vacuum Boson.

No comments:

Post a Comment