Higgs boson, a bad idea, part 2

{Note (added on April 2, 2015, months before the LHC run II):

There should be a vacuum boson {as vacuum [d (blue), -d (-yellow)] quark pair} transformed into vacuum {u (yellow), -u (-blue)}, see http://www.prequark.org/pq11.htm .

This vacuum boson's mass should be:

{Vacuum energy (about 246 Gev) divided by 2} + {a push over energy (vacuum fluctuation, about 2.46 Gev)}

= 123 + 2.46 = 125.46 Gev.

The above calculation has only one parameter: the vacuum energy. As a vacuum boson, its key feature is having a zero (0) spin.

Three years after the discovery of this new 125.4 Gev boson, the Higgs mechanism is not verified (see article form Nigel Lockyer, Director of Fermi Lab. at http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2014/04/24/massive-thoughts/ ). That is, the Higgs mechanism is wrong, totally nonsense, and of course there is no Higgs boson; it is a Vacuum Boson.

End note.}





In my last post, I have showed that the Higgs boson is a bad idea in terms of the tier-structure principle (TSP) of the Linguistics Manifesto. In Linguistics Manifesto, there is another principle, the language principle (LP).

Language Principle (LP) ---

i. System Z is described with a language X.

ii. A language Y (different from language X) can wholly describe the system Z.

Then, system Z is a proper subset of language Y. 

Corollary of LP --- if system Z is a proper subset of language Y, language Y must be valid to system Z.

For the Standard Model, the Higgs boson is a part of the model, not a language to describe that entire model.

If there is a “language” which can describe and reproduce the Standard Model, then, that “language” must be valid to the Standard Model.

In fact, the Prequark Chromodynamics ( http://www.prequark.org/  ) is a “language” which can describe and reproduce the entire Standard Model. Thus, regardless of whether the prequarks can be tested or not, the Prequark Chromodynamics is valid to the Quark Model according to the Language Principle of Linguistics Manifesto. That is, the idea of the Higgs boson might not be wrong but is a bad idea in comparison to a “language” which can describe and reproduce the Quark Model.

Perhaps, no physicist will care for this “Language Principle.” However, I am putting out this post as a mark on the issue of the Higgs boson.

Tienzen (Jeh-Tween) Gong

http://www.chinese-word-roots.org/