The *mainstream human physics* (MH physics) is now facing
some unresolved questions. A short list is as below.
a. The derivation of Standard Model
particle zoo (string unification)
b. The Planck data for dark mass and
dark energy
c.
The cryptic relationships between the
experimentally measured Standard Model constants (the theoretical base
for the free parameters {the Cabibbo and Weinberg angles, Alpha, mass-charges,
etc.})
d. Superunification (Quantum /
gravity unification)
e. The Baryongenesis
f.
The
rest mass rising mechanism
g. Many
others (lives, numbers, etc.)
That is,
there is a great divide between this MH physics and the Nature physics. Can the
MH physics at its current *standing* ground jump over this great divide? Even
if SUSY (with s-particles) were true, it would still not be able to resolve all
issues above. The M-string theory with many hypes cannot even reproduce the
Standard Model particle zoo but invented a copout (the other-universes) for its
failure.
Those are
failures. Repeating failures will not make them into successes. Yet, those
unresolved issue can be discussed theoretically, though the steps of human
physics development.
First, collecting
data --- knowing the phenomena.
Second,
finding the pattern (with equations to best fit the data) --- these equations
have *variables* and *parameters*.
Third,
finding the underlying causes (dynamics) for the equations (especially for the
variables).
Fourth,
finding the underlying framework for the *parameters*, deriving parameters from
an axiomatic system.
Thus, any
success in the step four (4), {The cryptic relationships between the
experimentally measured Standard Model constants (the theoretical base
for the free parameters [the Cabibbo and Weinberg angles, Alpha, mass-charges,
etc.])}, it will be an indicator for a promising pathway to get over this great
divide. Yet, the evolution of the Nature physics {from axioms (deriving
parameters, step 4) to phenomena (step 1)} goes opposite from the steps of
human physics development. And, such an
indicator is available at http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2012/04/alpha-fine-structure-constant-mystery.html
. In fact, from here, the entire known human physics can be reproduced.
However, instead of showing only the reproductions, I would like to show the
divide which is in fact the place that the bridge is needed. Yet, this great
divide can be discussed as four sub-divides.
The great
divide one: the issue of gravity.
In the MH physics, the gravity was understood as Newtonian
gravity (an instantaneous force) and as General Relativity (space-time
curvature or the graviton). Today, the Newtonian gravity is abandoned as a
proper gravity theory although it is still a good tool for calculating the
orbits of launching rockets. The instantaneity issue is beyond the rational
understanding, and the General Relativity has provided a good description for
the cosmos. Thus, the instantaneousness is no longer an issue, viewed as a nonsense
issue now. In analogy of Standard Model of particle physics, the *graviton* was
invented as the gravitational force carrier. Of course, there must be
*gravitational wave*, being predicted by the GR. With these two great
inventions (graviton and gravitational wave), MH physics has gone nowhere for
the past 80 years on this issue of gravity.
In the Nature physics, the gravity force is an instantaneous
force. By abandoning the instantaneity, it will of course forever block the MH
physics to deal with this gravity issue. Gravity is a *LONG* distance force,
significantly different from the other three forces which are *Contacting*
forces, that is, asserting the force by *shaking-hands* (force carriers as the
hands). Electromagnetic force has a *long-hand* (the photon) which forms the
*causal universe*. Yet, the gravity can assert
its force beyond the causal horizon (that is, travelling fast then light speed
if it is done with a particle carrier or a wave).
Nature starts with three steps (ready, get set, go). That
is, it will not invent two *sets* of law. If the fast-than-light speed is not
allowed for the other three forces, how can gravity get a special
privilege? Of course, not. Thus, the
graviton and the gravitational wave must be nonsense. There must be a different
mechanism for the instantaneity. This is done by “The Real-Ghost symmetry mechanism
(http://www.prequark.org/Mphy.htm#Real
).
That is, there is a *ghost POINT* (only a topological point)
as the symmetry *partner* of this material universe. Every particle of this
material universe is bouncing between the two (ghost point and the material
universe) with light speed. For two particles A and B, B is beyond the causal
horizon of A, that is, A and B can never shaking-hands directly. But, they are
still connected via the ghost point. The force between A and B is (see http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2012/04/rise-of-gravitation-and-hierarchy.html
),
F (gravity
force) = K ħ / (delta T * delta S) , K the coupling constant
The intrinsic (rest) mass is, in fact, arising from this real-ghost
mechanism (see http://www.prequark.org/Gravity.htm
).
Thus, Nature has two types of force,
1.
the contacting type by shaking hands with force
carriers, limited by light speed
2.
the non-contacting type via ghost point
connection and is instantaneous
The coupling strength of each force is determined by the
*pie* sharing. For the contacting type, the way of sharing is about the
*particle types* in the particle zoo which gives rise to the Cabibbo, Weinberg
angles (see “Theoretical calculation of Cabibbo and Weinberg angles, (http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2011/10/theoretical-calculation-of-cabibbo-and.html
)”) and Alpha. For the non-contacting type, the sharing is among *all*
particles in the universe. With this understanding, those couplings can and
were calculated (derived).
The Higgs mechanism is the reverse-engineering from the
weak-process (mainly for the W and Z boson masses) which is by all means not
dealing with the mass-giving in general. His idea came from the superconductor
condensation phenomenon, that is, an asphalt lake-like *field*, slows down the massless particle and gives it
an initial (apparent) mass. Two weeks ago, Peter Higgs received Nobel
Prize on physics for this idea. He is of course deserve it, as many others who
stood on his shoulder had received Nobel before him. Furthermore, for the past
40 years, the HEP of MP physics is driven by his idea, that is, in the human
terms, Higgs deserves the Nobel 10 times more than anyone else. But, his idea
is an analogy (or the shadow) of the Nature at best (see “Higgs Boson, a shadow
of the Prequark field (http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2011/09/higgs-boson-not-best-idea.html
)” and has nothing to do with the *gravity*.
Andrew (at http://dispatchesfromturtleisland.blogspot.com/2013/11/more-cosmic-accounting-and-some.html?showComment=1386086144012#c1902146350263304331
) commented, “Your preon-string theory is interesting (I've explored the
literature on them at some length and was an important contributor to several
of the Wikipedia articles on preons) but this theory is too speculative to
attract my attention unless it has testable phenomenological consequences.”
By resolving
the rest mass rising mechanism (see http://www.prequark.org/Gravity.htm
), all unresolved questions above are resolved automatically, as it can *predict* or *produce* (as the direct
consequences) the followings.
a. The derivation of Standard Model
particle zoo (string unification), see G-strings at http://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2013/08/24/g-string-and-dark-energy/
b. The Planck data for dark mass and
dark energy, see http://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2013/09/25/dark-energy-mystery-no-more/
c.
The cryptic relationships between the
experimentally measured Standard Model constants (the theoretical base for the free
parameters {the Cabibbo and Weinberg angles, Alpha, mass-charges, etc.}), see http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2012/04/alpha-fine-structure-constant-mystery.html
d. Superunification (Quantum /
gravity unification), see http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2012/04/rise-of-gravitation-and-hierarchy.html
What kind of
phenomenological consequences should be demanded in addition to the above?
The great
divide two: the issue of lives.
Even the above divide is bridged, there are still more
divides for the MH physics. Although all lives obey the laws of physics, the
rock bottom MH physics laws cannot describe the life-rising mechanism. In the
past, this failure was covered up by expelling it out of the scope of physics.
Recently, a new idea (Multiverse) was invented, saying that this universe which
we are live in is a special variety among zillions of other-universes. That is,
the physics law in general does not demand the rising of life, and the life
arises as a happenstance, not prohibited by the zillion possible universes. We
can examine this multiverse idea in three ways.
First way, reality vs theory --- for multiverse as a
reality, it has produced one special variety which gives rise to lives. Yet,
for multiverse as a theory, it has failed to pin point a pathway of finding the
nature’s way of generating this special variety *theoretically*, that is,
without any physical restriction. That is, even if the multiverse ides were a
good idea, the current multiverse idea is a failed theory.
Second way, there are three ways to produce different
universes.
1.
With different physics laws, P-multiverses
2.
With different nature constants, NC-multiverses
3.
With different boundary conditions
And, there are also three ways for the emerging of those
different universes.
i.
Emerging vertically, one after another.
ii.
Emerging horizontally, zillions co-exist
simultaneously.
iii.
Emerging both vertically and horizontally.
For the Cycling Universes (http://www.prequark.org/Initial.htm
, C-multiverse), their boundary conditions are different, and the zillion
pre-big-bang universes can be described with the *Inflationary Model*. This
C-multiverse needs not having different laws and different nature constants. On
the other hand, the horizontal type of multiverse (H-multiverses) cannot be
distinguished if they do not have different laws or different nature constants.
Yet, if those H-multiverses were emerging from a same source, it has theoretical
difficulty to construct a way of emerging out different laws from the different
initial conditions (forming different bubble, so to speak) while it might be
reasonable for evolving out different nature constants. Thus, the nature
constants of each universe should be bubble-depend. Then, if we can show that
the nature constants of *this* universe is not bubble-depend, there is no
reason for the nature constants of the other universes to be bubble-depend.
And, these NC-multiverses should be all connected as one universe. This proof
is available in the article “Multiverse bubbles are now all burst by the math
of Nature”, at (http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2013/10/multiverse-bubbles-are-now-all-burst-by.html
).
Third way, showing that the physics laws of *this* universe
does give rise to lives, not a happenstance. Life has three special attributes.
1.
It needs a computing device (an abacus, a
counting straw or a Turing computer)
2.
Its members have a special feature, the
*individuality*, that is, it needs *four codes (or colors)*, such as, the (A,
G, T, C) of the DNA codes.
3.
It species wants to be immortal. Then, it needs
*seven codes (colors)*, such as, (A, G, T, C, F, M, K). F is female, M – male
and K- kids.
In the G-string representation, both proton and neutron are
Turing computers, see (http://www.prequark.org/Biolife.htm
). And, there are 4-colors (red, yellow, blue, white) and 7-colors (red,
yellow, blue, white, G1, G2, G3) in G-strings. These (4-, 7-) colors forms a Ball-Donut
transformation, see (http://www.prequark.org/Gravity.htm#Bal
). For more detail of these, they are available in the article “KEY MISSION OF
LIFE”, at (http://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2013/09/02/key-mission-of-life/
).
That is, the physics laws of *this* universe carries the
strong anthropic seeds. The lives in *this* universe do not arise with
happenstance but is an expression of the anthropic seeds which are embedded in
the physics laws (the G-strings) of *this* universe. Thus, regardless of the
issue of multiverse, there is a giant divide between the MH physics and the
fact of *this* universe. More details are available in the article “Physics
laws must give rise to biological lives directly”, see (http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2011/11/physics-laws-must-give-rise-to.html
).
The great
divide three: the numbers.
For the past 100 years, physics is very successful while
*ignoring* some other obvious *facts*, the life and the math (using it only as
tools). The exclusion of these two facts from the scope of physics was
necessary tactically, as the laws of physics were, thus far, seemingly unable
to encompass them two. But, by excluding them in *principle* (such as using
Boltzmann Brain as a possible cause for the rising of life), physicists are
then fooling themselves, as this Nature consists of, at least, three parts.
a. The physical universe (not including life),
b. Lives,
c. Numbers.
Then, there are two possibilities. There are three different
sets of laws for these three parts. Or, those three are governed with a set of
unified laws. For the current physics paradigm, it has chosen the former. On
the other hand, I have selected the later (they are unified), as I already showed
that the *seeds of life* are embedded in the laws of physics when it is
described with the G-string representation. Yet, with this choice, both facts
(lives and numbers) must be the *check points* for forming the physics theory.
That is, the laws of math must be isomorphic to the laws of physics.
Different from life’s attributes (computing device,
individuality and immortality), the math universe (encompassing infinities) is
seemingly intrinsically different from the *physical* universe (a finitude).
Thus, the first task of this physics/math unification is about concretizing the
infinities to finites. The two concretizing
processes are described in detail in the article “The creation before the big
bang and before the inflation (http://tienzen.livejournal.com/584.html
)”. These concretizing processes give rise to *space, time and mass*.
Then, from a *new* math, the Quantum Principle was
*derived*. The detail is available in the article “The emerging of Quantum
Principle (http://tienzen.livejournal.com/973.html
)”.
Then, we must reproduce the entire Standard Model particle
zoo from math too, and this is done with the following articles, a) “Computability and the internal structure
of zero (http://tienzen.blogspot.com/2012/05/computability-and-internal-structure-of.html
)”, b) “The source of the “Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, part 3 (http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2011/05/source-of-spontaneous-symmetry-breaking_11.html
)”, c) “48, the exact number for the number of elementary particles (http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2012/04/48-exact-number-for-number-of.html
)”.
The following articles are also available for giving more
analysis on this divide.
Unification of physics and mathematics (http://www.prequark.org/Mlaw.htm ).
The Philosophical Meanings of Fermat's Last Theorem (http://www.prequark.org/Fermat.htm
).
Law of creation (http://www.prequark.org/think03.htm#A08
):
Law of Creation -- If B is
created by "creating something from nothing process," B (the something)
must remain to be "nothingness" in essence.
Law of Creation, part 2 (http://www.prequark.org/Create.htm
).
The great
divide four: the MH physics itself
The three divides above are created by Nature. That is, even
Martians will face those same divides in their Martian physics. However, human has
created another great divide by the human’s own works and choosing, taking the
wrong pathways. It will not be a big deal if both SUSY (with s-particles) and
M/F-string theories are not supported by any test data while they can provide
answers for the three nature-divides above. But, not only they did not, their arrogance
has declared two strong anti-nature statements.
1.
The
nature is un-nature. Two articles, a) “Nonsense of the un-nature Nature (http://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2013/12/17/nonsense-of-the-un-nature-nature/
)” and b) “CAN NATURE BE UNNATURAL? (http://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2013/09/19/can-nature-be-unnatural/
)”, have discussed this issue in detail.
2.
The Nature (this universe) is only a small part
of a big whole (the multiverse), that is, the observed physics laws in this
universe is not universal (according to the M/F-string theories) but is an
odd-ball with no significance in the universal physics laws. Of course, I have
showed that this is not the case, as the lives, the numbers are all isomorphic
to one another with the laws of physics of *this* universe.
In fact, there are three wrong pathways in this MH physics. The
first wrong pathway is SUSY (with s-particles). After many deadly blow by the
recent data, the SUSY devotees are becoming *religious*. They have turned SUSY
into the religious hope of SUSY parousia {see “The hope of SUSY parousia (http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-hope-of-susy-parousia.html
)”, “NATURE’S MASTER-KEY CUTS OUT SUSY THE UNDEAD (http://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2013/09/08/natures-master-key-cuts-out-susy-the-undead/
)”. With this great religious power, they even declared that Nature is
un-nature.
The second wrong pathway is built by M/F-string theories. I
have showed that their hideout haven (the Multiverse) is nonsense in the
anthropic physics above (“Multiverse bubbles are now all burst by the math of
Nature”, at (http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2013/10/multiverse-bubbles-are-now-all-burst-by.html
) and in the argument of Newtonian methodology (Model building, paradigm and
Truth, http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2013/12/model-building-paradigm-and-truth.html
). Yet, M-theory is not all wrong and can be a TOE if it adds two points, see “M-theory,
a TOE if and only if it adds two points (http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2011/11/m-theory-toe-if-and-only-if-it-adds-two.html
)”.
Two more articles below discuss more issues about M/F-string
theories.
M-/F-STRING THEORIES, FAILED THEORIES (http://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2013/09/25/m-f-string-theories-failed-theories/
).
BARKED UP THE WRONG TREES, M-THEORY AND SUSY (http://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2013/09/19/barked-up-the-wrong-trees-m-theory-and-susy/
).
Although the two wrong pathways have done some great damages
on the advancement of the MH physics, they are still labeled as *Speculative*. The
worst wrong pathway (which will hinder the advancement of human physics for generations
to come) is the Higgs idea which is now viewed as *verified* physics.
*After* the
greatest discovery of mankind, the new 126 Gev boson, it is viewed as a useless burble if it is a Higgs, and this
point was expressed by many prominent physicists after that new particle was *named*
Higgs.
A.
In the article “What *Should* We Be Worried
About? (http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=5465
), the Higgs connotes a great crisis of physics.
B.
Jester
(Résonaances, http://resonaances.blogspot.com/2013/08/what-about-b-to-k-star-mu-mu.html
) showed his trademark pessimism and frustration in August 2013.
C.
In the
article “the crisis in modern physics, (http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=6238
), Turok (Director of Perimeter Institute) said, "Theoretical physics is
at a crossroads [after the Higgs] right now…In a sense we’ve entered a very
deep crisis.
That is, the
Higgs does not and will not make any help on resolving the unresolved issues.
It is useless. The only chance for the MH physics
to get out of its failure-cycle is that the new boson is *NOT* the Higgs, and
this might take a generation or longer to conclude that. Fortunately, this newly
discovered 126 Gev particle can be accounted for by many other models, see http://www.prequark.org/Q2.htm . If we cannot find out that the new 126 Gev
particle is not a Higgs very soon, the MH physics will be stuck for another
long while. The Higgs analogy of an asphalt lake-like vacuum is wrong and can be replaced by the G-string vacuum,
and this is discussed in detail in the article “Higgs chicken, Higgs egg
and Higgs hallucination (http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2013/06/higgs-chicken-higgs-egg-and-higgs.html
)”.
While those SUSY (with s-particles) and multiverse devotees
are *religious* when they are talking about their babies, they uphold the
Newtonian methodology for all other models, that is, observation or else. In
fact, *all* observations are not correct per se, although they might not be
totally wrong. Aristotle’s observations
were the greatest at his time but are mostly not accurate now. It is the same
for Newton. The greatest observation effort of mankind produced the Standard
Model. Yet, it is the *rationale* which rules that SM is not complete. It will
take a while for observations to find out that the Higgs-vacuum is only a
*shadow* of the G-string space-time, but we can rule out Higgs with two
rationales.
a.
Higgs is useless for any issue of these three Nature divides.
b.
G-string has built bridges for all those three
Nature divides.
That is, by all means, Higgs is not needed as it is simply useless.
Searching and discovering the secret of Nature is the dream
of all physicists. Yet, most often, they will not accept other’s answers even
if they know that those are true, as they still try to find a different way to
get those same answers in their own way. But, for these three great Nature
divides, they sit here silently, blocking all detour attempts, cannot go over,
go under and cannot go around it.
Furthermore, these are indeed the great divides in the
literal sense, that is, I know all too well that this article will not move
those SUSY and Multiverse devotees one bit. I simply just *MARK* my words here
as the witness for the future of mankind.
Note (added
on August 29, 2016):
The
current (2016) mainstream physics status is this: #PostCheckmateTTF
(Post Checkmate temper tantrum fit).
See https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2016/08/26/vision-eulogy-the-post-checkmate-temper-tantrum-fit/
Copyright © December 2013 by Tienzen (Jeh-Tween) Gong
No comments:
Post a Comment